My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/18/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
7/18/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:40:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/18/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
line, he noted that the residents came in and paid their earned <br />dollars for those streets and most of the streets there are <br />maintained by them. He believed most of the people in the county <br />don't do that. <br />Chairman Wheeler advised that many people in the county <br />participate in our petition paving program, and Director Davis <br />explained the County's special assessment program where the <br />County funds 25% and those who benefit fund 75%. He pointed out <br />that due to the collector road status of 16th Street and the fact <br />that more of the general public would use it, the County funded <br />50% and the owners paid the other 50%; so, the general public had <br />more participation in the funding of it than other roads. <br />Commissioner Bird stated there is no question in his mind <br />that it is a charming road, and if it was a private road and we <br />were considering opening it up to the public, he would not <br />hesitate, but the facts are just the opposite; it always has been <br />a public street. <br />Mr. Brackett stated that he lives on 51st Court and the <br />residents pay for those roads themselves. It was explained that <br />51st Court is a private road. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed there are alternatives and <br />that the proper process is to go back through the TPC; evaluate <br />all options available, including temporary closing; and bring a <br />recommendation back to the Board; and that is what was proposed <br />in the Motion offered earlier by Commissioner Eggert. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD SECONDED THE MOTION OFFERED BY <br />COMMISSIONER EGGERT. <br />Joe Paultz, 51st Court, raised the point that the portion of <br />44th Ave. between 16th and 19th Sts. that connects Rosewood Road <br />to the Winn Dixie Shopping Plaza was suddenly closed, and he did <br />not understand how that happened. He noted there are only 3 or 4 <br />houses on that street. <br />Director Davis explained that about 21 years ago, a petition <br />was submitted by all the property owners on that road to have it <br />19 poor 7 �dl �,�, <br />rA G 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.