My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/25/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
7/25/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:42:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/25/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Therefore, the Board needs to determine if, in fact, the re- <br />strictions inow proposed by the developer (see attachment #4) meet <br />the intent <br />on of the Board's discussion and motion to approve the <br />project and restrict membership and facility use. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Staff reviewed an initial set of covenants and restrictions and <br />responded to this proposal with a discrepancy letter from both the <br />Attorney's Office and the Planning Department. (see attachment <br />#3). Subsequently, the restrictions were -revised (see attachment <br />#4 received by staff on July 19th) and reviewed by staff. The <br />major issue involved goes to the heart of the Board's concerns <br />about the use of the facility by the general public: a public <br />"commercial -like" use versus a use deemed to be accessory to The <br />Shores, Baytree, and Grand Harbor residential projects. <br />The developer is proposing annual memberships available to persons <br />not residing in any of the residential projects for the period of <br />time until the projects are built -out. A "cap" of 2,475 <br />memberships (2,400 memberships plus 75 "founder", gratis member- <br />ships) is proposed. <br />In the opinion of planning staff, the issue of prohibiting "tran- <br />sient" memberships is addressed by the proposed restrictions <br />requirement that beach club members must also be Grand Harbor Club <br />or River Club members. The proposed 2,475 memberships is in <br />accordance with comments made and discussed at the Board meeting <br />at which the project was conditionally approved. Allowing (prior <br />to project build out) annual memberships to non -project residents <br />does not practically affect the project's use or impact: a <br />maximum of 2,475 non -project members would have no significantly <br />greater impact than a maximum of 2,475 resident members, since the <br />Beach Club site is not located within any of the residential <br />projects. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners make a <br />determination as to whether or not the condition, relating to <br />membership restriction, attached to the Grand Harbor Beach Club <br />special exception use approval allows for non -project resident <br />memberships prior to buildout of residential projects. <br />Assistant County Attorney William Collins recalled that when <br />the Board granted conditional special exception approval for the <br />Beach Club facility last December, one of the conditions was that <br />membership restrictions be developed to insure that it would <br />function as an accessory to a residential project rather than a <br />commercial -type facility. In reviewing the membership <br />restrictions drafted by the applicant, he didn't feel that he <br />could sign off, because his understanding in reading through the <br />Minutes of that meeting was that it was the intent that the club <br />would be for the use of the residents of Grand Harbor, Bay Tree <br />and The Shores. <br />� � <br />X999 9 BO�. <br />JULL 2 bOK F',°:; .�:�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.