8/1/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DATE: JULY 26, 1989 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER Approximate COUNTY ADMINSTRATOR THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO Acres DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SE VICES FROM: WILLIAM F. MCCAIN �INEER CAPITAL PROJECTS E DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: 6TH AVENUE SEWER ASSESSMENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US 88 -08 -CS We have received copies of four letters which were sent to Commissioner Wheeler over the last week regarding the assessment hearing on the 6th Avenue sewer project. All parties in question were notified of the Preliminary Assessment Hearing as prescribed in the County's code governing assessment procedures. None of the parties in question attended the Preliminary Assessment Hearing. The Department of Utility Services has complied with all rules governing assessment projects, and we feel that the assessment is justifiable. However, the four parties now wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners. We are of the opinion that the decision to be heard by the Commission on the Agenda under "public discussion," is one which must be made -by the Board. Attached please find copies of the four letters and a copy of a memo to Terry Pinto explaining the basis of the assessment on these properties. DATE: JULY 24, 1989 TO: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES (N, FROM: WILLIAM F. McCAINI CAPITAL PROJECTS EgdINEER SUBJECT: SEWER FLOWS AND ASSESSMENT FOR 6TH AVENUE SEWER SYSTEM We have received three letters from property owners along the route of 6th Avenue who, for one reason or another, missed the preliminary hearing and now wish to be heard. The properties in question are zoned as follows: We took 50% of each property and assessed it for 6th Avenue; we also assessed 50% for Indian River Boulevard. Based on the zoning of the property, that which is zoned RMIO could ultimately generate 2,500 GPD and the CG could potentially generate 1,300 GPD. The sewer system was sized and designed accordingly to handle the ultimate flow from these properties. The zoning associated with this project is mixed similarly and therefore all properties were assessed on an equal square foot basis. 25 F�.� 61 Zoning By Approximate Parcel No. Percentage Acres Smeltzer 7 95% @ RMIO - 9.06 5% @ CG Beal 8 85% @ RMIO 10.41 15% @ CG White 9 60% @ RMIO - 6.97 40% @ CG We took 50% of each property and assessed it for 6th Avenue; we also assessed 50% for Indian River Boulevard. Based on the zoning of the property, that which is zoned RMIO could ultimately generate 2,500 GPD and the CG could potentially generate 1,300 GPD. The sewer system was sized and designed accordingly to handle the ultimate flow from these properties. The zoning associated with this project is mixed similarly and therefore all properties were assessed on an equal square foot basis. 25 F�.� 61