Laserfiche WebLink
total that property lying east of Jungle Trail and the County <br />could provide access to it wherever they wanted. <br />Attorney Collins pointed out that we could not construct an <br />alternative access because there is going to be a conservation <br />easement over that tract and that would prevent the building of a <br />road. <br />Mr. McQueen believed if there is a public need for it, <br />something could be done prior to setting up the conservation <br />easement. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the better way to do it would be <br />to go ahead and keep the public access and to limit right and <br />left hand turns and put up no outlet signs. We have the ability <br />any time in the future to abandon that if we so choose, and he <br />felt we should maintain our flexibility and if there is a <br />problem, we have options to work with the developer in the <br />future. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt the whole point of Jungle Trail is <br />to be able to drive the length of the Trail to enjoy its ambiance <br />and understand its historical significance. She noted that the <br />public already has two access points to Jungle Trail, and <br />commented that she personally would hate to drive into her <br />development and see a multitude of signs at the first crossroad. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked Director Davis if he wants to <br />have less access on and off A -1-A or more, and Director Davis <br />advised that our arterial road policy is to consolidate access <br />points and limit them as much as possible. However, CR 510 is <br />also an arterial connection. His feeling is that it might be <br />best to encourage access to Jungle Trail on the existing north <br />connection to A -1-A. <br />The Board members indicated their agreement, and Commis- <br />sioner Bird believed that protects the integrity and the corridor <br />atmosphere of the Trail. <br />Mr. McQueen referred to Condition #4 which just states they <br />47 ROOF pkq <br />I <br />