8/8/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

With conditions relating to reservation of easementiand a unity of title to consolidate parcels, staff has no objection to the request. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the County abandon its rights to 92nd Court and to 21st Street and that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners be authorized to execute the attached resolution (Attachment #3), with the following conditions: 1. that the right-of-way area be retained as drainage and utility easements; and 2. that a unity of title be filed for the lots in block R and the tract to the east owned by the applicapt. Commissioner Eggert asked whether 92nd Drive goes through, because it appears that the people living to the back of this tract have to zig-zag through the space set out as a park. Stan Boling, Chief of Current Development, pointed out the zoning changes to commercial between the park tract and the properties that are closer to SR -60, and felt the Board may not want to mix residential and commercial traffic. Commissioner Scurlock understood there has been an overall problem with ingress and egress because of the close proximity to the intersection of SR -60 and 1-95, and felt the situation would certainly be improved by consolidating more than one piece of property. Mr. Boling advised that the DOT has verified that their 60 -ft. access service road can be utilized by developers. Chairman Wheeler opened the Public Hearing, and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. John Fountain, petitioner, questioned the wording in the above staff recommendation where it says that staff feels it is prudent to retain the right-of-way as drainage and utility easements until a plan has been submitted for development and at that time alternate provisions can be made for drainage and utilities, if necessary. Since they are planning to submit a development plan in the very near future, he asked if they could 17 L AUG 8 1989,