8/21/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AUG 2 11989 my 77 PAGE 652 Unless her fellow Commissioners object to that, she would like to be sure that is allowed. Commissioner Scurlock asked where those uses would be allowed, and Commissioner Eggert stated that they would be allowed in residential and possibly in some commercial areas, especially border commercial to residential. Commissioner Scurlock understood they would be allowed as a, special exception then, but Director Keating wasn't sure how they would do it. Commissioner Eggert advised that they are finding out more and more that this is what they have to do, especially if they are secured facilities. Since the people can't go out into the community, there is no real point in having them in residential. She just wanted to be sure that we are looking at all our land uses and thinking that this may be a problem we may face in the future. Director Keating explained that is the intent in Policy 1.15, and that staff would go back and make it more specific so it does not seem to preclude it. Michael Keifer, 1943 Charlotte Avenue, suggested that we take another look at the land use designations of the residential properties along the SR -60 corridor to make sure that the land use changes from low density and medium density are appropriate. He pointed out that some of the existing neighborhoods are substantially built out and have developed at lower densities than called for, such as Sixty Oaks, which is 6 upa. Commissioner Eggert pointed out that the zonings would hold it as it is. Mr. Keifer also wished to comment that he didn't feel that the map that was included in the newspaper advertisement of this public hearing showed any changes from the 1982 Comp Plan map. Sasan Rohani, Chief of Long -Range Planning, explained that the map that was included in the newspaper advertisement shows the boundaries of Indian River County, and the notice stated that 6