9/5/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

didn't want to add it as an emergency item; and so it was delayed another week. Commissioner Scurlock wished to know, in terms of other space needs, if staff anticipates expanding the scope of services in one of these existing contracts and going out for another RFP. Administrator Chandler commented that mainly we do not want to slow this down. He agreed that we do need an overall review of the space needs of our departments because we are getting extremely tight, but he did not think it would be beneficial to piggyback that onto this at this point; although, it may dovetail in towards the end of this project. Commissioner Scurlock explained that the reason he brought this up is that he was appointed on a committee as liaison between our site plan process and the school system. There have been discussions in the past in terms of our growth as opposed to School Board growth and who wants more of this very building. He felt that needs to be coordinated with all of these topics that we have. Commissioner Bird believed we found out the School Board had a longer term lease than we realized, and Administrator Chandler confirmed that it is a 30 year agreement which was executed in 1979 with a further option for renewal. Chairman Wheeler asked if the City has taken any action on expanding the Master Plan. Administrator Chandler advised that the CRA was looking at using this consultant in conjunction, but he did not know if they have received a proposal yet either at the CRA or City Council level. Commissioner Bird stated that one concern he has about the agreement and the description of the project is that he felt we are pretty well painting ourselves in a corner on limiting ourselves to the area of the existing courthouse. He could not name an alternative right now, but had a concern about limiting .them to looking at this specific area which he felt almost says 29 SEP 5 1989 Pore 77F'.�,