My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/5/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
9/5/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:03 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/05/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR HIGHLANDS MS 1 INTERSECTION <br />The Board reviewed memo from Acting Traffic Engineer Cox: <br />TO: James E. Chandler, <br />County Administrator <br />-THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., <br />Public Works Director <br />FROM: David B. Cox, P.E., <br />Acting Traffic Engineer <br />SUBJECT: Traffic Signal for Highlands/US 1 Intersection <br />REF. LETTER: William A. Lewis, P.E. to James W. Davis, P.E. <br />dated May 15, 1989 <br />DATE: August 29, 1989 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />A traffic study conducted by FDOT indicates that a traffic signal <br />is now warranted at Highlands Drive and US 1. It has been <br />requested by FDOT that the County provide the funding for the <br />design and construction of this project through local traffic <br />impact fees. On August 2, 1989, the Transportation Planning <br />Committee approved the addition of this project to the County's <br />20 -Year Capital Improvements Plan. The proposed FY 1989-1990 <br />funding of County road projects is attached, however the funding <br />for this project is not included. The estimated cost of the <br />project is $60,000. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />Alternative No. 1 <br />Project be approved, using funding from District VI Traffic <br />Impact Fees. <br />Alternatives No. 2 <br />Do not approve use of Traffic Impact Fees and postpone the <br />signalization until FDOT funding becomes available. <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING <br />Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 be approved, using funding <br />from District VI Traffic Impact Fees. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commis- <br />sioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved Alternative <br />No. 1 using funding from District VI impact fees as <br />recommended by staff. <br />35 <br />,SEP 5 198 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.