My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/5/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
9/5/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:03 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/05/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP 5 1989 <br />6 F.�.,J� 84 <br />Commissioner Bird believed what they are saying is that if <br />we are going to buy part of it, go ahead and buy all of it, and <br />they will reimburse us. He asked Director Davis if the request <br />before us would be for the Board to authorize him to do some <br />further negotiating or is he looking for some kind of firm <br />position by the County. <br />Director Davis explained that we are going to request that <br />Mr. Gregory consider selling the county the impoundment area that <br />we need for mitigation, and while we are communicating with him, <br />we could also indicate that the state is interested in purchasing <br />the remainder. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, to authorize Public Works Director <br />Davis to proceed as explained above. <br />David Williams, representative from Country Club Property <br />Owners Association, just wanted the Board to know that there are <br />60 families in Country Club Pointe who are opposed to Alternate <br />#3 and want Alternative #2 for all the reasons that have been <br />stated, and he did not think we should be intimidated about <br />changing our mind and telling the DOT we have other ideas because <br />we have a lot more information and there are a lot of people who <br />have a lot to say about Alternate #2. <br />Jim Granse informed the Board that in the Indian River <br />Taxpayers Association, they have a Mr. Tom Johnson who was a <br />state highway commissioner and who made a vast investigation on <br />the bridge, including aerials, etc. He has a very large traffic <br />file on this matter, and he spoke at the High School in favor of <br />Alternate #3. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />48 <br />s f � <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.