My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/10/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
10/10/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:23:40 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:06:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
adding on and improving your living conditions in opposition to <br />building a new house, and Planner Boling explained that the <br />ordinance requires this dedication when you come in for a new <br />building permit - that is what trips it, and this particular <br />situation is for a new residence. He further noted that the <br />mobile home is non -conforming, and it couldn't be upgraded <br />itself. <br />Director Keating again pointed out that there is no traffic <br />impact fee because there is no increase in traffic that necessi- <br />tates capacity improvements. <br />Attorney Robert Jackson came before the Board <br />the complaints set <br />BOARD CERTIFIED <br />ESTATE PLANNING AND <br />PROBATE ATTORNEY <br />• <br />MEMORANDUM <br />in regard to <br />out in his memo to the Board, as follows: <br />ROBERT JACKSON, P. A. <br />ATTORNEY AT LAW <br />2165 15TM AVENUE <br />VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 <br />1407) 567-4355 <br />TO: Mr. Gary Wheeler, Chairman <br />Mrs. -Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice <br />Mr. Don C. Scurlock, Jr. <br />Z' is . Margaret Bowman <br />Mr. Richard M. Bird <br />• FROM: <br />Robert Jackson <br />BOARD CERTIFIED <br />REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY <br />September 28, 1989 <br />Refusal by Planning Department to deliver building <br />permit to Robert Neal Jackson unless property conveyed <br />to County <br />,.Over the past month, my son, Robert Neal Jackson, has been <br />•'completing the requirements to replace his mobile home with a <br />-;.regular residence on Glendale Road east of Rebel Road. He <br />^completed everything and was told everything was fine, except for <br />a question by the Health Department. He removed the existing <br />-Amobile home; destroyed the existing septic tank; and commenced <br />=::}= filling and starting his new ipme. He was belatedly called to <br />4 ;:the Planning Department, where he was told they had his permit <br />''i?but he could not get it unless he involuntarily gave away 30 feet <br />``_ y of his, property to the County for future expansion of Glendale <br />" 'f.:Road. The property is a citrus grove. Enclosed is the list of <br />"4'`requirements he received and the form giving the property, which <br />he received from Stan Bolling. <br />To start with, this is no way for our government to treat a <br />citizen - waiting until the last second and after he thought he <br />had completed the requirements - to extort over $5,000 in land <br />from my son. The ordinance in question was obviously enacted to <br />require access from property to a main arterial road. Why should <br />he "give" 30 feet, while his neighbors, some of whom -have houses, <br />are not required to do so? <br />20 <br />OCT 1 a9U9 <br />BOOK <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.