My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
12/19/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:35:14 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:30:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC 1989 <br />ROOK 7l FGF 675 <br />5 <br />south of the node is designated LD -1, Low -Density Residential 1, <br />up to 3 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the CR <br />512/I-95 node as containing 665 acres. The land use policy for <br />commercial/industrial nodes has been to permit both commercial and <br />industrial development with the specific use and intensity to be <br />controlled by zoning. <br />The location within the node, size and configuration of the <br />property, relationship to the transportation network and sur- <br />rounding land uses must be evaluated in the determination of the <br />specific zoning. Thus, while the commercial/industrial node <br />classification permits a wide variety of uses, all of those uses <br />are not necessarily appropriate for the entire node. <br />Transportation System <br />The subject property has primary access on C.R. 512 which is <br />designated as a principal arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. <br />County site plan regulations require non-residential developments <br />fronting major and minor arterials to establish frontage/marginal <br />access roads. The property also fronts 105th Court, a local road, <br />and 106th Avenue, a collector road; both of these are nearly <br />impassibledirt roads. Specific road and _traffic concerns are <br />addressed in greater detail during the site plan process. <br />Environment <br />The Comprehensive Plan does not designate the subject property as <br />environmentally sensitive; however, it is identified as lying <br />within the 100 year floodplain. <br />Utilities <br />Public water and sewer are not available to the subject site nor <br />are they currently programmed. The absence of utilities could <br />provide some developmental= limitations. <br />In reviewing this request, staff has examined the existing land <br />use pattern and the proposed land use pattern set forth in the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />The requested zoning is a higher intensity than the current <br />Single -Family District; however, the CH, Heavy Commercial District <br />_ would be considered consistent with the Commercial/Industrial node <br />land use designation. <br />'review of surrounding property uses indicates that little <br />;development has occurred in this area. The dominate land uses <br />'are vacant and agricultural land along with scattered residential <br />ciuses...The node, itself, despite its strategiclocation along the <br />;Interstate Highway is largely vacant. Uses in the node include a <br />gas station/snack shoppe ppe and Recreational Vehicle Park at the I-95 <br />interchange, and two industrial operations (Hetra and Pro -Fold) in <br />the northeast portion of the node. <br />It is expected that the northern portion of the county will <br />experience rapid growth over the next 20 years. Since much of <br />this growth will occur in and around the City of Sebastian, the CR <br />512 link to I-95 will become increasingly important. It was the <br />expected growth and the desire to avoid future land use conflicts <br />that provided the impetus to expand the node to its current size. <br />The latest expansion added the area on the south side of CR 512 to <br />the node. Since the subject property is within the area added to <br />the node, the propoerty's potential for commercial zoning is not <br />in question. Instead, the issue is the type of commercial zoning <br />that would be appropriate. This situation is further complicated <br />by the existence of platted residential lots and streets adjacent <br />to the subject property. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.