My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
12/19/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:35:14 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:30:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
!' <br />ROOK <br />78 F;P,,[ 6977 <br />Cabinet have the ability to commute sentences. The Sheriffs are <br />asking that be put to a stop. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if the Sheriff is requesting that we <br />join in the lawsuit or just support it by virtue of the <br />Resolution, and Sheriff Dobeck stated that he is asking that the <br />Board support the Resolution and forward it to the Governor and <br />the D.O.C. <br />Chairman Wheeler stated that he would also like to send a <br />Resolution to the League of Counties and ask them to support this <br />as he felt strongly that something has to be done. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to address the following <br />remarks in Sheriff Dobeck's letter dated December llth: <br />The consequences of early release impact every citizen in this state. When we in <br />law enforcement are fortunale to re -arrest those who have committed crimes after <br />being released early from the state prison system they are held . In . the county jail <br />pending trial. <br />In many counties these prisoners contribute to overcrowding at the county jails. <br />In some instances the. Department of Corrections sues to enforce state mandated <br />standards. You should be aware that the standards which the state enforces <br />against the counties are more strict than the standards imposed by the federal <br />government against the stale. As a result of this counties are forced to build <br />bigger jails. Taxpayers are asked to approve increased sales and advalorern taxes <br />to support bigger, jails. On l)crenrbcr 6, 1989 the Press Journal printed an article <br />quoting Commissioner Scurlock saying, "IOC and the sheriffs are to blame for the <br />crowding of county jails." Ile was further quoted that "Sheriffs write 80 per -cent <br />of the administrative rules the DOC uses to inspect jails for <br />deficiencies—everything from guard -to -prisoner rotation to living conditions." <br />must apologize that I am • not familiar with the process Mr. Scurlock speaks <br />about. The 1)OC and legislature are solely responsible for the authorship of the <br />laws, rules and regulations the sheriffs are bound. by in the operation of their <br />facilities. And, yes, Florida sheriffs are contributing to the overcrowding of our <br />jails by arresting criminals, a practice we will continue. Don't you agree it's <br />Lime now for convicted criminals to serve their full sentence. •As a Florida sheriff <br />1 believe we must be given the opportunity to become more involved with this <br />process. 1 iow much is enough? so • <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that when we first started in on <br />the various phases of the Jail, we at one point were told by our <br />architects and Michael Wright, the Administrator at the time, <br />that we would get preapproved staffing and manning levels from <br />D.O.C. prior to the construction of the Jail. He believed 23 was <br />the number agreed upon, and then we subsequently found that a <br />higher staffing level was being required. Commissioner Scurlock <br />noted that he personally made some very strong comments about the <br />D.O.C. changing the rules of the game after pre -approval, and a <br />56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.