My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/11/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
1/11/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:43 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:36:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/11/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JAN 11 �090 <br />na 78 PnE 8.90 <br />Chairman Eggert asked if the Historical Society had received <br />Judge Kanarek's letter saying that the present Courthouse is not <br />the original courthouse in this county. <br />Millie -Bunnell, president of the IRC Historical Society, <br />explained when Indian River County was established in 1925, the <br />Courthouse was in the old Palmetto Hotel/Charlton Apts. building, <br />but the courtrooms were in the second floor of the old Simmons <br />Building on the corner of 14th Avenue and 21st Street. In 1935 <br />we built the present courthouse, and since we were rather a poor <br />county at the time, the federal government came in and helped us <br />through the WPA program. <br />Chairman Eggert commented that she was struggling with the <br />significance of the historical importance of the present <br />courthouse especially since it is not in very good shape. <br />Commissioner Bird felt his main concern in choosing one of <br />these concepts is the cost of property acquisition and the costs <br />that go with that, i.e. demolition, relocation of utilities, etc. <br />He was concerned that we may find ourselves spending more money <br />than what we anticipated, and emphasized that he wouldn't start <br />building a home without knowing what his lot would cost. <br />Administrator Chandler explained that the consultants wanted <br />to be sure. that all potential costs were identified, but at the <br />same time, we told them to be extremely conservative. We think <br />that they have loaded in just about every cost they could <br />identify and that these figures are realistic. He emphasized <br />that the driving force that affects just about everything is the <br />parking requirements, which translate into property acquisition, <br />demolition, etc. It is very important not to under estimate <br />those figures. <br />After considerable discussion on parking requirements and <br />the impact on the commercial uses surrounding this area, Mr. <br />Halback pointed out that they were not here today to design the <br />building, just to present the three final concepts and get the <br />15 <br />F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.