1/11/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F_ i 0 tlJL BOOK . 7th and believed a couple of statements that had been made this morning were misleading. He noted that the CRA zoning line splits the proposed building location on all the 3 concepts presented. The east end of the building would be in the CRA zone, which has a 50 -ft. height limitation and zero parking requirements. If the County has been told it has parking requirements, it is because of the portion that is on the west end of the site. He noted that a referendum will be held on March 13, 1990 to reduce the height limitation to 35 feet. Mr. Reeves explained that the graphics merely show a building envelope which the building would fit within. That envelope has an extremely adequate amount of open space, setbacks, and all of the things that Mr. Fraser feels should be considered. However, those things all will be considered in the next step, and then very specifically in the actual design. They feel they have been very conservative and that the building can fit very comfortable within that building envelope itself and still meet the City's requirements. The reality, however, is that adequate parking must be provided, regardless of the requirements. Circuit Judge L. B. Vocelle pointed out that they just received copies of the three final concepts late yesterday and only had last evening to review them. In fact, they only received notice of this meeting the day before yesterday. They feel very strongly that they should be given reasonable notice on anything the Board of County Commissioners is going to do relative to their workplace. Judge Smith and Judge Kanarek would have been here today had they been given reasonable notice. He, himself, had to reschedule a jury until this afternoon in order to be here. They want to have input into the design of the new facility, but are not asking to be in on the ultimate decision. They agree with Commissioner Wheeler's suggestion for adding the Judges and the County Clerk to the architectural selection s 19