Laserfiche WebLink
F � <br />lJAH -1 i a30 BOOK <br />plan. The higher densities are there, and it makes sense that if <br />you are going to allocate a large expanse of areas for Agricul- <br />tyre, that should be the principal use there and densities should <br />be real low: <br />Discussion continued about various alternatives and what all <br />this would do to land values. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt there is more land value there <br />today in terms of active producing citrus than in any other use, <br />and it was further noted that while you can raise cattle north of <br />here, you sure can't raise citrus as demonstrated by the recent <br />freeze. <br />Commissioner Wheeler felt the plan is flexible and you can <br />go in and change it annually. <br />Director Keating agreed it is flexible, but believed in <br />dealing with the DeBartolo issue, we have been finding out just <br />how difficult this Comprehensive Plan process is now. <br />Commissioner Scurlock commented that he would like to see <br />the area west of Blue Cypress go to 1 unit per 40 acres; take the <br />public conservation area and have zero density; and then come in <br />on the next portion to the east and possibly go to 1 unit per 15 <br />acres instead of 10. <br />Commissioner Bird felt you either come up with a density <br />that makes it feasible to do residential development or it <br />doesn't matter what you put on it. <br />Director Keating stated that is exactly the point we are <br />challenged with by the DCA, who says are you expecting this <br />development at what you are projecting. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed Chairman Eggert raised a good <br />point, which is that there are two areas around 1-95 where we <br />need to provide for some density - the node at Fellsmere which <br />goes on both sides of 1-95 and the Oslo node in the vicinity of <br />1-95 which has been identified as an area for a future inter- <br />change. <br />12 <br />M <br />