Laserfiche WebLink
they couldn't develop because it isn't within the Urban Service <br />Area. <br />Director Keating felt saying that large projects are exempt <br />from the Plan, if that is what Mr. Kneller is saying, is not a <br />recommendation here. <br />Chairman Eggert noted if the project was that big, it would <br />need a DRI anyway. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if planned development can occur <br />outside the Urban Service Area if they provide their own infra- <br />structure, and Attorney Kneller poinred out that it could not at <br />greater than .2 upa, and any planned development would be greater <br />than that. <br />Attorney Vitunac informed Attorney Kneller that our policies <br />are that the corporation or owner would have to put in their <br />water and sewer and deed it to us anyway; so, that is not a big <br />bonus to us. That is the way we do it already. <br />Director Keating pointed out that the Board must determine <br />if their objective is in -fill development or encouraging more <br />sprawl development because even planned communities are sprawl. <br />Commissioner Bird stressed that his objective is to recog- <br />nize the prime areas in the -county that are suitable and logical <br />for development, and they may not necessarily be contiguous to <br />the heavy density areas that are developing right now. We might <br />have to "hop -scotch" over some of the Rural Ag areas to get to <br />the 10 Mile Ridge, which he felt is a prime area for development <br />in this county, certainly in the next 20 years. <br />Chairman Eggert believed we can go in and modify our Plan to <br />accommodate that. <br />David Risinger felt Attorney Kneller has hit on a critical <br />point - whether you can come in with a DRI and pay all those <br />costs and under this still have a prayer of being approved. He <br />informed the Board that he hJs developed some suggested language <br />for Policy 2.2 and Policy 2.6, which is as follows: <br />s, <br />109 <br />� ° '4J <br />