Laserfiche WebLink
OBJECTIVE 10 INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE COASTAL ZONE <br />Infrastructure in the coastal zone shall be adequate to provide <br />the designated levels of service indicated in the respective <br />Indian River County Comprehensive Plan elements and sub -elements, <br />including future service areas and phases of implementation. <br />- NO COMMENT <br />OBJECTIVE 11 LIMIT DENSITIES IN THE COASTAL HIGH -HAZARD ZONE <br />Indian River County shall limit residential densities on the <br />unincorporated barrier island to less than 3 units per acre, and <br />direct development and population concentrations away from known <br />or predicted coastal high -hazard areas. <br />Director Keating referred the Board to POLICY 11.5, as <br />follows: <br />POLICY 11.5: The county shall prohibit the platting of lots in <br />ttFie'C_oastal High Hazard Zone which would require the location of <br />structures seaward of the FDNR C.C.C.L. (Lots of record before <br />February 13, 1990 shall be exempt from this requirement.) <br />Director Keating explained that there is nothing in here to <br />prohibit anyone from building on an existing lot totally seaward <br />of the C.C.C.L. We are just saying no new lots should be created <br />in this zone. The intent is to try to limit the amount of con- <br />struction that you are putting in the Coastal High Hazard area. <br />Darrell McQueen advised that he has a bit of a problem with <br />that requirement. He noted that at Ocean Oaks they platted lots <br />that are almost entirely beyond the new line. This requirement <br />will impact anything on the barrier island that is still in the <br />county. The Polo Club would be impacted with this. They are <br />talking about going to the state and platting back of the line, <br />but getting permission to put swimming pools seaward of the line. <br />He noted that the state does permit lots to go beyond that <br />C.C.C.L. line because they have no input into the platting <br />process. He continued to discuss the history of the C.C.C.L. and <br />county and town ordinances, and Mr. McQueen believed if the state <br />could have stopped construction beyond that line without it being <br />a "taking," they would have. He was opposed to establishing this <br />criteria, and he felt this should be left up to the state. <br />�1Boor <br />I J _ i4lu <br />1 3 7 <br />