2/13/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r � � Attorney Vitunac noted that if you can build on metes and bounds, there might be some argument about unequal protection for a platted lot. Planner Crosley pointed out that this doesn't say there won't be lots east of that line, but just that the lot can't be created entirely east of it so that you would have to build a structure east of the line. Commissioner Bird suggested that we could say lots can't be platted "entirely" east of that line, but Mr. McQueen noted that you still have to transfer that ownership, and if you don't plat the land, you can't transfer the title. Commissioner Bird felt Policy 11.5 creates too many problems and suggested we just eliminate it. It was generally agreed to eliminate Policy 11.5. Discussion ensued about 3 upa in the Coastal High Hazard Area, and Mr. McQueen voiced his opinion that 3 upa is adequate. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Goal It is the goal of Indian River County to provide a recreation and open space system which meets the needs of all residents of the county, is accessible to all residents of the county, and maxi- mizes the county's physical, cultural and historical resources. OBJECTIVE 1 ADEQUATE PARKLANDS The county will at all times during the planning period have a sufficient supply of parklands to accommodate the county residents at the accepted service levels. Director Keating informed the Board that we have changed the levels -of -service set out in the policies under Objective 1 substantially. We have reduced them. One objection by the DCA was that we only used resident population, and they said we had to use functional, which is both resident and seasonal popula- tion. When we applied those new total resident and seasonal population numbers to the service levels we had, it came out that ° �y BOOK -a7 1 3 9 F C r