Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Eggert pointed out that he is not required to <br />change his zoning if it is less than designated, and it was <br />pointed out that the fees are set by ordinance. <br />Mr. Schlitt further noted that after doing that, he will <br />have to go through the Subdivision route because this has been <br />split once before. That is about another $2,000 in fees, and all <br />he wants to do is sell one lot. Also, to do this, he will lose <br />approximately one acre of his land, plus all the fees. <br />Director Keating confirmed that there already has been one <br />split of this property; so, this would be under the subdivision <br />requirement and also apparently there is a R/W deficiency and <br />there will be a R/W requirement of probably 301. <br />Mr. Schlitt continued to stress that to sell one piece of <br />his property will require about $1,500 in fees, and Commissioner <br />Scurlock pointed out that the option is not to be able to sub- <br />divide it. <br />Jim Young, of Kimley Horne S Associates,`came before the <br />Board representing E. Lapperman who owns about 17 acres of land <br />south and east of the eastern end of Gifford Dock Road at the <br />south end of Grand Harbor. When he purchased this land, it was <br />zoned RM -6. The prior Land -Use Map had an environmentally <br />sensitive rating on it at 1 upa. The proposed Land Use Map which <br />went to DCA set this at 1 unit per 20 acres, and he understands <br />the proposed Land Use Map gives this a C-2 designation of 1 unit <br />per 40 acres. Additionally, by Policy 5.5, the Conservation <br />Element of the Plan does indicate that by 1991 there will be an <br />attempt to establish a mitigation bank and by 1992 also transfer <br />density rights to non-contiguous properties. Mr. Lapperman's <br />land is all in a conservation state, and they would like to <br />request the Board to keep the 1 upa designation on this property <br />at least until the county has time to implement the policies of <br />the mitigation bank and the density transfers to non-contiguous <br />properties. <br />VED" U <br />89 <br />