Laserfiche WebLink
FEB 2 `d 1990 <br />Bou I <br />Page 9 <br />February 19, 1990 <br />There are also issues of compatibility which need to be addressed. <br />The first of these is the direct impact on residential areas <br />adjacent to the project, including Wallace Acres and Rivera <br />Estates. At a minimum, these areas will be protected by buffers <br />required between commercial and residential districts. This can <br />be augmented by site designs which maximize the use of landscaped <br />green areas to ensure that these areas are not only screened <br />visually but also buffered from lighting, traffic noise and fumes. <br />Entrances, perimeter landscaping and external traffic improvements <br />will need to be designed to not only provide for efficient and <br />safe circulation but to lessen the impact on existing development <br />along the external perimeter of the area. <br />Relationship to Comprehensive Plan <br />A land use change of the magnitude of that proposed is likely to <br />change the condition and needs of other services and facilities <br />that have been addressed in the comprehensive plan. These changes <br />to other plan elements are influenced by the timing of the <br />development associated with the proposed land use change as much <br />as with the change itself. In this case, the improvements <br />associated with this land use change will be required by 1995. An <br />analysis of the effect of the change on other plan elements <br />follows. <br />° Population Projections <br />The proposed land use change will not greatly impact the overall <br />population projections of the county or county sub -areas. Because <br />of the magnitude of the proposed project and the number of jobs <br />created, the timing of residential population growth may be sped <br />up. <br />° Traffic Circulation <br />The greatest impact on the county as a result of the proposed <br />Indian River Mall is likely to be on the road network. The total <br />number of trips generated by the project is likely to exceed <br />35,000 trips per day. In order to assess the impact on the <br />system, an analysis was done to identify the expected traffic <br />distribution and determine the improvements that would be required <br />to maintain county level of service standards. <br />The analysis was done by using the Florida Standard Urban <br />Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) computer program which was <br />also used in the county's Traffic Circulation Element. This model <br />simulated the effects of the proposed mall on the county's future <br />roadway network for the years 1995 and 2010. The model was first <br />updated to reflect the existence of the project in the base <br />Population and employment data. <br />When the model is "run", automobile trips are assigned to road <br />segments based on the attractors and generators. A comparison of <br />the traffic! volumes to roadway capacities is used to identify the <br />projected level of service on any road segment. It is then <br />Possible to' identify the specific improvements that would be <br />required. <br />As expected, most of the increase in trips attributed to the mall <br />occur on those roadway segments closest to the mall. Tables 4.7.2 <br />and 4.7.3.sh64 the peak hour peak season volumes and the peak <br />season daily VoiijEbb fdt 1995 and 2010, respectively. These <br />comprehensive Pied tdbles have been updated to reflect buildout of <br />the mall gfid dndiiiary f$cilities. Since Tables 4.7.2 and 4.7.3 <br />show projected volumes on all roadway links with the mall, they <br />provide the basis for a review of roadway improvement needs. <br />48 <br />� � r <br />