My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/20/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
3/20/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:53:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/20/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Wheeler noted that his primary reason for <br />supporting Alternate #1 is to not have access to the Boulevard. <br />AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION TO FILE EMINENT DOMAIN_ PROCEEDINGS - <br />INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD PHASE III RIGHT-OF-WAY - PARCEL #109 <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/12/90: <br />TO: James Chandler DATE: March 12, 1990 FILE: <br />County Administrator <br />James W. Davis, PE <br />FROM: Public Works Director <br />Description and Conditions <br />AUTHORIZING <br />RESOLUTIONS TO FILE <br />SUBJECT: EMINENT DOMAIN PRO- <br />CEEDINGS - I.R. BLVD. <br />PHASE 3 RIGHT-OF-WAY <br />PARCEL #109 <br />REFERENCES: Donald G. Finney, IRC <br />to Property Owners <br />dated Jan. 24, 1990 <br />The County Public Works Department has offered to purchase 2.135+/- acres <br />from Donald L. Ames, James G. Copeland, John T. Dayton, Hugh K. <br />McCrystal, and Ferdinand P. Becker for the Indian River Blvd. Phase III <br />right-of-way ( 2.066 acres) and an uneconomic. remainder ( 0.69 acres) . . The <br />property owners have refused the county's offer of $20,900.00, which was <br />based on the average value established in two current appraisals obtained by <br />the County. The property owner has not indicated his desired compensation <br />for the property. <br />%Alternatives and Analysis <br />f The following alternatives are presented: <br />Alternative #1 <br />Attached is a Resolution authorizing the acquisition of the subject <br />property by Eminent Domain proceedings. The first alternative is to <br />approve the Resolution and authorize staff and legal consultants to <br />proceed with Eminent Domain action. The recommended action will <br />require the deposit of $20,900.00 with the court at the time of the <br />judicial hearing on an Order Taking at a subsequent date. A jury trial <br />will be held to determine fair market value. The Board previously <br />authorized the retention of outside legal services with Blackwell, Walker, <br />Fascell, and Hoehl, attorneys in_ Miami, FL. _to represent the County. <br />Legal fees for this alternative are included in staff's request. <br />Also, for purposes of necessity, staff is recommending approval of the <br />right-of-way alignment map for the project. <br />Alternative #2 <br />Deny approval of the attached resolution and abandon the project. <br />a �• <br />47 <br />MAR 2 0'990 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.