My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/10/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
4/10/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:58:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
View images
View plain text
F, <br />APR 1®990 <br />BOOK 79 FACE 80"� <br />out that the county recognized that motel use was hard to equate <br />to a single family residence use, and they think the same type of <br />approach should be taken with this type of mini -warehouse. There <br />is no category in here for that kind of use. At total build -out <br />each unit would have half a bath, and perhaps a fractional ERU <br />should be considered, but if they have to wait for the study, so <br />be it. <br />Commissioners Scurlock and Bird believed the Commission is <br />saying that there may be some problem with this category, but the <br />Commission cannot just pull a number out of a hat, and Attorney <br />Henderson stated that they are not asking the Board to settle on <br />a number today. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if Attorney Henderson had a <br />problem with a Motion for 4 & 4, which would be 8 units, and the <br />future to be determined by the CH2M Hill study which will be <br />available in 90- 120 days, and if they develop prior to that, <br />they will be charged whatever the impact fees are under this <br />ordinance. <br />Attorney Henderson stated the only problem they have with <br />that approach is that it presents his client with uncertainty at <br />this point in time. They have to wait out the study, and then it <br />is possible the rate might be the same or possibly even more. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that if it is more, they can spread <br />it over 5 years, but Attorney Henderson stressed that this is <br />simply a case where this category does not fit this use, and that <br />is what Section 26 is all about. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if anyone present wished to speak on <br />this matter. <br />Tom Furness, 75th St., expressed his belief that as the <br />county grows, we are going to have a need for the type of <br />building that FEDD is getting ready to do, and he believed we <br />need to come up with some way to charge these impact fees based <br />on the use; otherwise, you will discourage this quality type of <br />development. <br />i <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).