My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/10/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
4/10/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:58:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />APR 10 1990 <br />B00'K <br />Director Keating stressed that the most difficult area to <br />deal with was the Gifford area because of the large MXD district, <br />and there have been some errors and omissions made in changing it <br />into specific Land Use designations. He then addressed specific <br />properties that were mistakenly changed. For instance, the <br />property a little bit east of King's Highway and just south of <br />North Gifford Road (the Miller property) showed up as single <br />family in our survey and we had allocated M-2 in the CLUP map; <br />that was definitely an oversight based on incorrect data, and it <br />should go to a commercial designation. The corrected Land Use <br />Map they are recommending shows that the Miller property would be <br />commercial, and there is some property on the far east end of <br />that segment that also shows up primarily as residential in the <br />survey they did. Actually it is mostly industrial in there with <br />some single family mixed in, and they feel it should be an <br />industrial category. <br />There is another property on the south where the Public Use <br />boundary was extended too far just to reflect one parcel. The <br />City of Vero Beach city limits is one parcel to the east and <br />county property is just to the west, and that was an obvious <br />oversight. There is another one further west - a Public Use <br />piece of property, which is the Mosquito Control District, and it <br />should be referenced that way. Then we have one other piece that <br />is not depicted there. It is just south of Lindsey Road just <br />west of Old Dixie; that somehow showed up single family on our <br />initial surveys, and that should be designated industrial. <br />At this point it was noted that there are quite a few <br />interested property owners present, and they should be allowed to <br />state where they disagree with staff. <br />Chairman Eggert first wished to note that she disagreed with <br />a piece of property - the industrial property across the street <br />from the airport, which is right up next to the railroad tracks <br />and has been industrial for a long time. Her biggest problem is <br />that we put sewer and water in here; Gifford is constantly <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.