My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/10/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
4/10/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:58:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
telling her that they need areas to bring jobs there; and to her <br />this parcel which we have eliminated is a good parcel for that <br />purpose. The map shows it M-2, but she believed we actually want <br />it to be commercial/industrial. <br />Board members indicated their agreement with the Chairman <br />and Commissioner Scurlock proposed a Motion, but Attorney Vitunac <br />interjected that we can't do rezoning and re -Comprehensive <br />Planning now. Today is just for correcting obvious errors and <br />whatever is corrected must have been a mistake. <br />Debate followed as to what constitutes an obvious error, and <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed this actually was a mistake on our <br />part as Commissioners. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that if the Commissioners want to <br />change their minds, this will have to be done in the next Compre- <br />hensive Plan amendment submission period. All we can correct <br />today are typos and obvious errors where it can be shown from the <br />record that they should have been something else and somehow got <br />on this map incorrectly. <br />Asst. County Attorney Collins further clarified for the <br />record that if the Board is making a change in policy or there is <br />a dispute as to whether this particular use should be in this <br />particular place, that is something that should have been argued <br />during the Plan adoption period. What staff is suggesting is <br />that if there was an error in the nature of disputing a Land Use <br />as residential when there was actually a commercial operation on <br />the site; that is a clear error; it is a ministerial oversight <br />that can be corrected. The Comprehensive Plan is to be amended <br />only once every 6 months, but it also says if a court was to <br />review it, they would look at the appropriateness and complete- <br />ness of the Plan in coming to a decision; so, if they looked and <br />saw there was a commercial egg farm on a piece of property and <br />you showed it as residential, the data which the Plan and its <br />policies were based on was inaccurate and the whole thing is <br />flawed. Attorney Collins felt that the Board can correct those <br />45 BOOP, lu �',1GEOPJ <br />APR 10 1990 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.