Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />BOOK .79 FREE 835 <br />ministerial oversights to reflect what is actually out there, or <br />if you drew a line to show a boundary between public and private <br />property in error by moving it over 10 acres, you can correct <br />that - that is an obvious error, but you can't just sit down and <br />go back and revisit the policy decisions about where should this <br />land use be or where should that be without going through the <br />Plan amendment procedure to see what the impact will be. <br />Debate continued at length in regard to something being a <br />policy decision as opposed to correcting an oversight, and <br />Chairman Eggert contended that if something was misunderstood by <br />the majority in the first place, she did not feel it would be a <br />policy change. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that as far as he was concerned, it <br />was an oversight that we didn't spend more detailed time on these <br />particular changes in the Comprehensive Plan. We really didn't <br />target in on this area and have it explained that there were <br />quite a few parcels being changed in here. <br />Chairman Eggert felt what was said to us was that this was <br />no longer going to be a whole Mixed Use District in that the <br />zoning for the residential was reduced from 14 downward for the <br />top cap. That says to her that you simply took off the MXD and <br />left everything else the same. But the problem is that we didn't <br />leave everything else the same; we took out some of the things <br />that were already there. That is the statement that she <br />misunderstood - that we were removing the designation of MXD and <br />lowering the cap on residential, which says to her that nothing <br />else changed. In other words, her understanding was that we are <br />just not calling it MXD any more and if something was industrial <br />or commercial, it would be called industrial or commercial. <br />Attorney Vitunac asked Director Keating his understanding of <br />what constitutes the mistake policy because he will be the expert <br />who will be speaking for us in court. <br />Commissioner Bird asked what court? He believed we did make <br />a mistake unknowingly, and if we correct this and send it to the <br />46 <br />