Laserfiche WebLink
Senior Planner Loeper advised that property, which is <br />located between Floral Park over to Palm Gardens, is 7 different <br />parcels. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that now you are talking about a <br />very broad area and talking about a major change, but Chairman <br />Eggert advised that what she is talking about is that she <br />"goofed" on Gifford, and she believed the Comprehensive Plan <br />"goofed" on Gifford; so, she felt that whatever is the correct <br />way to change it is what we should pursue. <br />Commissioner Bird did not think that correcting this, even <br />if we make these major changes, will have any significant effect <br />on the Comprehensive Plan. It is a very small area out of the <br />overall county, and he did not feel that the DCA will object to <br />our making these corrections. <br />Attorney Collins advised that it would not be the DCA that <br />objected; it would be the neighbors who feel they have been <br />adversely affected who might object and could seek injunctions. <br />He felt that only clear errors can be changed and not when you <br />get into the area of "what should it have been." <br />Chairman Eggert did not see where there was a problem if the <br />properties just went back to what they were before. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that the bottom line is that the <br />Commission is saying that we want to leave it the way it was, and <br />then just take the chance of someone filing an action against us. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bird, the Board unanimously agreed to "leave <br />it the way it was - Commercial." <br />Chairman Eggert asked if we are satisfied all the way <br />through this area now, and Attorney Lloyd stated that he was not <br />sure exactly what the last vote consisted of. <br />Commissioner Scurlock explained that the last vote was "to <br />take it back to the way it was all the way over to the "P" - that <br />53 <br />BOOKl u F'," lj 8��0 <br />