My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/10/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
4/10/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:58:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br />APR 10 1999 q Do�'� <br />or 41 <br />on the east side and Residential on the west side. She asked if <br />this wasn't all Industrial. <br />Senior Planner Loeper confirmed it is all presently zoned <br />Industrial; the parcels owned by the County created the Public <br />District, and the rest was given the Residential designation. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed the latitude on "Public" is. <br />pretty wide open; so, Residential in between is not necessarily <br />any transition. <br />Director Keating agreed that this is a very unusual <br />situation with Residential on 2 sides and then 2 parcels in the <br />middle, one of which is Mosquito Control. <br />Commissioner Bird was not sure what our status is today in <br />regard to making these corrections, but noted that if we were <br />going over this as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan process <br />a month ago, there is not a doubt in his mind, that he would have <br />voted for the Commercial. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that staff believed what they <br />were doing was the right recommendation, but he also does not <br />concur with that now. <br />Chairman Eggert stated that where she still stands is that <br />this isn't a change in policy but a change in understanding that <br />map, which map was not brought in front of the Board. <br />Attorney Vitunac continued to contend that if the Board made <br />a mistake in understanding what was presented, then it should <br />come back in 6 months because what we are correcting today, as <br />Attorney Collins said, are only ministerial errors that are <br />obvious from the record. <br />Commissioner Bird commented that he is having a hard time <br />differentiating with voting to return the property represented by <br />Mr. Lloyd to what it was and then turning this down just because <br />there doesn't happen to be a commercial use on this property <br />although it has been zoned Commercial for years. <br />Commissioner Wheeler referred to the 20 acres to the north <br />and asked if the building to the right of that is on one parcel. <br />L <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.