My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/22/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
04/22/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 6:38:00 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
153
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004BG.tif
SmeadsoftID
14195
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
program areas, which in turn reduces the impact fee. In others, if the investment <br />was made in earlier years and are not projected to continue at the same levels, the <br />credit may decrease compared to the previous study, which in turn increases the <br />impact fee. <br />• Finally, the cost and demand components are adjusted to reflect the most recent <br />available data, which affects different land uses at different rates. <br />This technical report includes the final calculations for non-residential land uses while <br />figures for residential land uses are still being refined. Given that the fees for almost all of <br />the non-residential categories are decreasing, the County prefers to adopt changes to the <br />non-residential impact fee schedule at this time. This approach is also consistent with the <br />County's economic development goals. <br />The following tables provide a summary of calculated fees for seven representative land <br />uses. The complete schedule has almost 50 land uses and a comparison of all fee categories <br />is included in Appendices G through I. The tables include the following: <br />Table ES -1 (Unincorporated County) <br />• Current adopted fee <br />• Calculated maximum impact fee <br />• Percent change from the current fee to the calculated fee <br />• The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix G.* <br />Table ES -2 (Unincorporated County) <br />• Current adopted fee <br />• Affordable growth impact fee <br />• Percent change from the current fee to the affordable growth fee <br />• The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix H.* <br />Table ES -3 (Preferred Alternative, Unincorporated County) <br />• Current adopted fee <br />• Staff Recommended impact fee <br />• Percent change from the current fee to the staff recommended fee <br />• The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix I.* <br />* Can be found in the full Impact Fee Update Study, available at www.irccdd.com/Applications/Impact_Fee/Index.htm <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />April 2014 <br />ES -3 Impact Fee Update Study <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.