My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/23/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
09/23/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 5:03:45 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:52:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
09/23/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
205
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004A7.tif
SmeadsoftID
14152
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2014 Solid Waste Management Plan <br />some of its activities that previously were part of the landfill division under its <br />convenience center and recycling division. <br />• In part, due to these efforts, as well as a decline in the total volume of waste <br />disposed, the total cost of operating the solid waste system has declined <br />from $11.4 million in FY 2008 to $10.4 million in FY 2013. Approximately <br />30% of the system total operations cost is for the CCCs and the transfer <br />system from the CCCs to the Landfill for less than 10% of the waste and less <br />than 5% or recyclables. <br />• The .tonnage of waste disposed has declined by more than the reduction in <br />solid waste costs, and thus the unit cost per ton of waste disposed has risen <br />from $45.15 in FY 2008 to $55.43 in FY 2012, or 22.8% over this 4 year period. <br />• The baseline projection of costs for FY 2014 through FY 2024 was developed <br />assuming that the system costs would increase by 3.0% annually, while <br />revenues, WGUs, and waste tonnages would increase by 0.5% annually. <br />With these projections the ending cash balance would remain positive <br />through FY 2017, but then become negative for the remainder of the <br />projection period. Thus changes to the system and/or rates are needed to <br />maintain SWDD's financial viability. <br />• Fundamentally, the system has few guarantees to attract new collection, <br />recycling and solid waste processing investment. The voluntary <br />subscription collection system, year to year municipality participation, <br />curbside recycling collection limitations and no commercial recycling <br />program carries great risk for private vendors. Unless the County changes <br />fundamentally its guarantees of waste into the system, much greater rates <br />will be charged to customers and/or the County may need to take greater <br />risk financially to attract these changes. <br />Figure ES -1 depicts the existing landfill site configuration and the proposed <br />Segment III Cells 1-8. <br />ES -6 <br />%NEEI_ SCHAFFER <br />162 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.