My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/13/2015AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
01/13/2015AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2018 11:07:13 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:10:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/13/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
112-0017-R
Book and Page
282
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000H\S0005C9.tif
SmeadsoftID
14513
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Since the PZC meeting, the church had adjusted speaker equipment orientation within the <br /> sanctuary to direct sound away from the surrounding residences and toward Old Dixie <br /> Highway. <br /> • The church had also added sound-attenuating foam to several windows along the south <br /> elevation of the existing sanctuary, which is the side of the sanctuary that faces an adjacent <br /> residence across 13th Place SW. Parties indicated that the adjustments had reduced sound <br /> previously directed towards residences. <br /> • The project engineer provided decibel readings taken during several different services <br /> (Wednesday evening, Friday evening, Sunday morning,and Sunday evening)and measured <br /> at various locations on and off the church grounds. Those readings confirmed compliance <br /> with County noise regulations, taken after the previously described sound-related <br /> adjustments were made by the church. <br /> • The project engineer also provided several images depicting where the driveway is proposed <br /> to be relocated as part of the project. Those images provided the neighbors with more <br /> information than images shown at the PZC hearing. <br /> • The property owners continued to express concerns about the existing (nonconforming) <br /> parking along 13th Place SW, and the capacity of the site to accommodate more <br /> development and potentially more people. <br /> • The nearby property owners inquired about the appearance of the proposed addition and its <br /> aesthetic compatibility with surrounding residential buildings. <br /> While most of the items identified above were discussed at length, the three items most <br /> discussed were parking and associated traffic along 13th Place SW,exterior noise levels,and the <br /> aesthetic appearance of the addition. <br /> At the joint meeting,staff noted that the proposed site plan provides a formal parking layout that <br /> will better organize access and parking, and that the engineer had provided evidence that <br /> currently a maximum of 13 parking spaces are used during regular services,while the proposed <br /> plan will provide 21 spaces. Staff also noted that 10 of the 21 total parking spaces are <br /> grandfathered-in nonconforming spaces that allow vehicles to back directly into the 13th Place <br /> SW right-of-way, across the street from a residence. Staff stated that those 10 spaces are <br /> allowed to remain as grandfathered-in spaces since the scale of the project constitutes a minor <br /> site plan rather than a major site plan. <br /> At the joint meeting, staff noted that the church made several adjustments to reduce the current <br /> exterior noise levels and stated that noise levels are an operational characteristic that will need to <br /> be controlled by the church in accordance with County noise regulations (Chapter 974). <br /> With respect to aesthetics, staff noted at the meeting that the church site and surrounding <br /> neighborhood are not located within a special aesthetic corridor and, therefore, no special <br /> corridor architectural requirements apply to the proposed addition. <br /> Since the October 31" meeting, the church has agreed to two additional design-related <br /> conditions of approval to address aesthetic concerns expressed by the neighbors.The church has <br /> agreed to paint the addition to match the color of the church building and to provide additional <br /> foundation plantings (shrubs) along the west (rear) facade to break-up a "blank wall" <br /> appearance along the side of the addition most adjacent to a residence. Those design-related <br /> conditions have been incorporated into staffs recommendation. <br /> 167 <br /> F:A(bmmunity Development\CurDevABCC\2015 BCC',FullGospelAssembly(SP-SE-14-07-17).docx 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.