Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />APR 2 4 1990 <br />�, - o <br />BOOK 9 PAGE �1�� <br />I. Budget Amendment #057 - Sewer Line Assessment, Indian River <br />The Board reviewed the following memo from the OMB Director: <br />TO: Members of the Board <br />of County Commissioners <br />DATE: April 17, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT 057 - TO PAY SEWER LINE ASSESSMENT <br />ON INDIAN RIVER BLVD. PHASE I - CONSENT AGENDA <br />FROM: Joseph A. Baird <br />OMB Director <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />In order to obtain right-of-way for Indian River Blvd. Phase I, Indian River County entered <br />into agreements with some property owners which stated that they would not have to pay <br />for any costs for the installation of sewer line on Indian River Blvd. The Utility Department <br />is installing a sewer line down Indian River Blvd. and assessing all adjacent properties. <br />Pursuant the agreements, Indian River County will have to pay the assessments for the <br />following property owners: <br />_ 1. <br />R. A. and Peggy Schacht <br />12 3339 00015 0000 00016.0 <br />$ 9,306.65 <br />2. <br />Peggy Jane Schacht Trustee <br />12 3339 00015 0000 00015.2 <br />$ 9,375.50 <br />.3. <br />Nathan & Melvin W. Tanen Jr. <br />07 3340 00000 0060 00001.0 <br />$ 9,937.80 <br />4. <br />Nathan & Melvin W. Tanen Jr. <br />013340 00000 0030 00002.0 <br />$14,206.70 <br />5. <br />Nathan & Melvin W. Tanen Jr. <br />07 3340 00000 0060 00002.0 <br />$14,309.98 <br />6. <br />Nathan & Melvin W. Tanen Jr. <br />12 3339 00000 1000 00049.0 <br />$19,898.56 <br />7. <br />R. A. and Peggy Schacht <br />12 3339 00015 0000 00016.1 <br />562.30 <br />$77,597.49 <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff is recommending that the assessment costs of $77,597.49 be paid from fund 004, <br />M.S.T.U. $0990. The attached budget amendment appropriates funding to pay the <br />assessment. <br />Commissioner Scurlock explained that he asked that this item <br />be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion in that he felt <br />there is some policy involved, and if we concur with it, he felt <br />we still need to spread on the record the justification for this. <br />He continued that the proposing funding is from the MSTU, and <br />actually road projects and acquisitions of R/W can be funded from <br />a variety of sources - impact fees, Gas Tax, General Fund monies, <br />or MSTU funds. He believed there was a great deal of debate <br />internally among the staff in terms of acquiring R/W, and this <br />12 <br />� r <br />