Laserfiche WebLink
digging the lake in the dry, but they are digging it in the wet. <br />The St. Johns River Water Management District has determined that <br />8-10 feet is the deepest that a surface water management lake can <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if staff feels that we should <br />readdress our ordinance with regard to the digging of lakes in <br />the wet and the effect on adjacent water supply, and Robert <br />Keating, Community Development Director, advised that the St. <br />Johns River Water Management District has indicated that just <br />digging a pit should not affect the water table, but that is <br />assuming there is no dewatering and no unusual conditions. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if staff is still comfortable <br />with our present ordinance and think that it doesn't need any <br />real modification, and Director Keating didn't feel there was a <br />need for any modification from that perspective. <br />Mr. McQueen asked Attorney Vitunac if the exception could be <br />granted since one half of the lake does meet the 1,000 ft. <br />requirement, and Attorney Vitunac advised that the ordinance <br />says, "the lake." <br />Mr. McQueen pointed out that it talks about the sand mining <br />project or the sand mining site, and Attorney Vitunac stated that <br />in his opinion, that encompasses the whole contour of the lake <br />and if any portion of that is within 1,000 feet, it is off <br />limits. If the lake was dug so that the entire boundary or <br />perimeter wasn't within 1,000 feet, then they could do it. <br />Director Boling explained that the project site is defined <br />in the mining ordinance as that portion of the real property <br />which is being excavated or mined, together with all property <br />within 100 feet of the perimeter of the excavation or mining <br />activity, and that basically includes the area of development <br />that is shown. The resubdivision was platted in 1979, and all of <br />the lots have frontage on either Kings Highway or South Winter <br />Beach Road, and no paving was required when that subdivision was <br />approved. <br />29 noi 9 PAGE100 <br />I <br />