My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/1/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
5/1/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/5/2015 12:44:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/01/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />MAY 11990 BOOK .7 f�1��LVc x� <br />establish those easements, draw the easements and get them <br />signed. The project is limited to $120,000 for design and <br />permitting. Resident inspection is limited to $4,500, but we had <br />to go out and have the easements established which was another <br />$6,500. We felt the easements should be assessed back even <br />though they weren't part of the initial project and weren't <br />included in the engineering approval. That added to the cost <br />somewhat, but in the assessment process itself, we found that it <br />is a low pressure system and each one of the establishments along <br />the route we have chosen will require a low pressure pumping <br />system with each one of them being a little different. Some of <br />them simply will be a simplex pump and some a duplex pump. We <br />have designed the pumping facilities, but have decided that it <br />would not be fair to include the costs of the pumps in the total <br />assessment since some people would be paying for a pump that <br />would be larger in size than what they actually need. The pumps <br />are not going to become part of the total assessment. Whoever <br />needs that portion will pay for it, but everyone using the common <br />line will be assessed. It is similar to what we did in the <br />Rockridge project. So, what we are looking at is all of the <br />engineering costs that we want to assess back to those benefiting <br />properties, but $6,375 was specifically for the 17 easements that <br />were not in the original approval. <br />After a brief discussion, the Board scheduled the Public <br />Hearing for 9:05 o'clock A.M. on Tuesday, May 22, 1990. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by. <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0, <br />Chairman Eggert being absent) adopted Resolution 90-53, <br />providing for a sewer force main on the west side of <br />U.S. #1 between 10th and 4th Streets; providing the <br />total estimated cost, method of payment of assessments, <br />number of annual installments, and legal description of <br />areas specifically served. <br />54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.