My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/12/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
6/12/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:45 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:05:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/12/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN <br />1 2 199 _ 800K 8 0 PAGE i� <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that he would like to dispose of <br />these lots but earmark those monies back for acquisition of other <br />properties. <br />Commissioner Bird believed we have a fund set up for that, <br />and we could put the money in there. He felt that possibly we <br />should set a minimum bid, and noted we need a comparable safe. <br />County Attorney Vitunac advised that the City of Vero Beach <br />got around $50,000 per lot; however, three of these lots have an <br />easement sharing a driveway that will reduce their value a bit. <br />He noted that we can have R/W Agent Don Finney make an estimated <br />appraisal and then put a minimum on the bid. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bird, -the Board unanimously authorized staff <br />to go ahead with the process of disposing of the above <br />described lots, setting a minimum bid figure, and bring <br />that back to the Board for final approval. <br />TCRPC UPLAND POLICY <br />Chairman Eggert advised that she and Commissioner Bowman <br />feel they need some direction from the Board on this matter. She <br />informed the Board that she has proceeded with both the DCA and <br />TCRPC under the theory that since we approved a Comprehensive <br />Plan, unless otherwise directed by the Board, she would be <br />governing her feelings about anything that was going on in terms <br />of that Comprehensive Plan. She noted that one of our problems <br />was not being in conformance with the TCRPC plan on the 250 <br />upland situation, and they now have summarized what they are <br />going to bring forward to the Council on Friday. <br />Discussion then ensued about, the TCRPC Policy 10.1.2.2. as <br />compared to the County's Policy 6.12, which policies are as <br />follows: <br />78 <br />L l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.