My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/10/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
7/10/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:45 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:10:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J L10W <br />needed for the new complex. There is a definite value associated <br />with that real estate and the structures contained thereon today. <br />When the new complex is built on hi.p location, Mr. FLick firmly <br />believed that there will be an inherent increase in value on that <br />real estate. He stressed that it is a "win, win" situation for <br />everyone - the taxpayers, the County, and the property owners. <br />Chairman Eggert was concerned about the spaces Mr. Flick <br />needs for the Florida Federal Building, and Mr. Flick advised he <br />is not including the 4 Brackett lots in the real estate he has <br />talked about. He believed, however, that the real estate cited <br />in his notes is sufficient for all the parking needs of the <br />judicial complex, etc. <br />Chairman Eggert pointed out that Concept G/A requires those <br />4 lots, and Mr. Flick commented that he has placed a conservative <br />value of 40 per sq. ft. on the Annex and State's Attorney Office, <br />and, if there is any problem, he would be more than happy to <br />entertain making that part of the negotiations associated with <br />this particular proposal. Regarding satellite parking, Mr. Flick <br />believed a joint use agreement could be worked out with the <br />Methodist Church for parking in the block directly west of the <br />parking garage. He reiterated that he will have this all reduced <br />to a master contract for the property involved in very short <br />order. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if, regardless of what scenario we <br />agree to, we are going to seek appraisal of the properties <br />involved, and Administrator Chandler stated without question. By <br />law we must do that. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that there is little known law that <br />gives the Board the option to go right to contract without <br />appraisal if they wished. <br />Commissioner Bird commented that it is easy for anyone to <br />say we have all these contracts under option and a willing <br />seller, but a willing seller at their.price. He felt we are <br />going to be paying an absolute premium, and he would want an <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.