My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/24/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
7/24/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:45 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:11:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/24/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Assignment of Funds: * Public transportation: Increase share <br />of state funds to a minimum of 14.3% <br />until the year 2000: Afterwards share <br />increases to a minimum of 156. <br />Ports: $8 Million per year for <br />infrastructure improvementsi Seaport <br />Commission created. <br />Intrastate Highway System (fully <br />controlled and partially controlled <br />access) created. Funding as follows: <br />* FY 90/91 - $76.6 Million <br />* FY 91/92 - $136.6 Million <br />* FY.92/93 - $151:3 Million• <br />Indexed at the consumer price index <br />thereafter. <br />Proceeds from the State Comprehensive <br />Enhanced Transportation System Tax <br />(additional four cents) must be <br />distributed back to the District where <br />collected and to the maximum extend <br />feasible, programmed for use in the <br />County where collected. Known as <br />"District Dedicated Revenue' or 'DDR• <br />funds. <br />7/23/90 <br />ALTA)CATION OF DISTRICT DEDICATED REVEM (DDR)* <br />(III. MILLIONS) <br />TOTAL 18.4 46.6 51.2 55.6 60.0 64.7 296.5 <br />*This revenue is also known as the State Comprehensive Enhanced Transportation System Tax and includes the new <br />four cents of gasoline tax for each county in District 4 <br />Mr. Yesbeck noted that basically they looked at three <br />priorities - (1) to protect the adopted program; (2) to look at <br />the projects that had been deferred or deleted over the last <br />couple of years and bring them back; and (3) then to add new <br />projects. Mr. Yesbeck then 'referred to the status of key <br />projects in Indian River County, as follows: <br />19 <br />JUL •� <br />90/91 <br />91/92 <br />92/93 <br />93/94 <br />94/95 <br />95/916 <br />SIE -YEAR <br />TOTAL <br />Broward <br />9.0• <br />22.5 <br />24.5 <br />26.3 <br />28.1 <br />30.1 <br />140.5 <br />Indian River <br />0.6 <br />2.0 <br />2.3 <br />2.6 <br />2.9 <br />3.1 <br />13.7 <br />Martin <br />0.8 <br />2.1 <br />2.3 <br />2.5 <br />2.7 <br />3.0 <br />13.4 <br />Palm Beach <br />6.6 <br />16.8 <br />18.5 <br />20.2 <br />21.9 <br />23.7 <br />107.7 <br />St. Lucie <br />1.2 <br />3.2 <br />3.6 <br />4.0 <br />4.4 <br />4.8 <br />21.2 <br />TOTAL 18.4 46.6 51.2 55.6 60.0 64.7 296.5 <br />*This revenue is also known as the State Comprehensive Enhanced Transportation System Tax and includes the new <br />four cents of gasoline tax for each county in District 4 <br />Mr. Yesbeck noted that basically they looked at three <br />priorities - (1) to protect the adopted program; (2) to look at <br />the projects that had been deferred or deleted over the last <br />couple of years and bring them back; and (3) then to add new <br />projects. Mr. Yesbeck then 'referred to the status of key <br />projects in Indian River County, as follows: <br />19 <br />JUL •� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.