My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/7/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
8/7/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:45 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:12:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/07/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Disposal District, to read into the record the State mandated <br />requirements for recycling, and Mr.,/Brooks read aloud the <br />following staff recommendation: <br />DATE: JULY 2, 1990 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILITY ERVICES <br />FROM: RONALD R. BROOKS, MANAGER <br />SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRIC <br />- SUBJECT: MANDATORY SOLID WASTE COLLECTION <br />With the mandate of the 1988 Solid Waste Act to recycle 300 of <br />Indian River County's solid waste stream by 1994, the District <br />had a recycling study performed by Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. <br />With that study, combined with the experience of other counties <br />and the experience of communities in other states, it was recom- <br />mended that the District adopt mandatory solid waste collection <br />with the eventual implementation of a commingled doorstep recy- <br />cling program. It was determined that this type of program was, <br />-to date, the most successful recycling program that would meet <br />the mandated 30% recycling of the solid waste stream by 1994. <br />In addition to meeting the recycling mandates,' it is essential <br />that the District provide an equitable and environmentally sound <br />means of solid waste collection to reduce illegal dumping and <br />accommodate the waste service needs of the County. <br />ANALYSIS <br />District staff has prepared a proposed solid waste ordinance <br />that incorporates mandatory waste collection as well as solid <br />waste management and permitting requirements needed to control <br />the waste management operations within the District. The ordi- <br />nance also provides for •a varied means of supporting the <br />District's operations and allows the District Board to adopt <br />several procedures for -the operation and financial support of <br />the District. <br />This proposed ordinance basically adopts mandatory waste collec- <br />tion and several permitting requirements that gives the Solid <br />Waste Disposal District, through approval by the District Board, <br />the authority and responsibility to implement the mandatory col- <br />lection and fund the operations as deemed appropriate and neces- <br />sary. The actual implementation of the mandatory waste collec- <br />tion and accompanying funding procedures will all be implemented <br />through resolution and contractual agreements, all of which are <br />subject to the approval and execution by the S.W.D.D. Board. <br />20 <br />ROOK +� <br />Director <br />Pinto asked Ron Brooks, Manager of the Solid Waste <br />Disposal District, to read into the record the State mandated <br />requirements for recycling, and Mr.,/Brooks read aloud the <br />following staff recommendation: <br />DATE: JULY 2, 1990 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILITY ERVICES <br />FROM: RONALD R. BROOKS, MANAGER <br />SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRIC <br />- SUBJECT: MANDATORY SOLID WASTE COLLECTION <br />With the mandate of the 1988 Solid Waste Act to recycle 300 of <br />Indian River County's solid waste stream by 1994, the District <br />had a recycling study performed by Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. <br />With that study, combined with the experience of other counties <br />and the experience of communities in other states, it was recom- <br />mended that the District adopt mandatory solid waste collection <br />with the eventual implementation of a commingled doorstep recy- <br />cling program. It was determined that this type of program was, <br />-to date, the most successful recycling program that would meet <br />the mandated 30% recycling of the solid waste stream by 1994. <br />In addition to meeting the recycling mandates,' it is essential <br />that the District provide an equitable and environmentally sound <br />means of solid waste collection to reduce illegal dumping and <br />accommodate the waste service needs of the County. <br />ANALYSIS <br />District staff has prepared a proposed solid waste ordinance <br />that incorporates mandatory waste collection as well as solid <br />waste management and permitting requirements needed to control <br />the waste management operations within the District. The ordi- <br />nance also provides for •a varied means of supporting the <br />District's operations and allows the District Board to adopt <br />several procedures for -the operation and financial support of <br />the District. <br />This proposed ordinance basically adopts mandatory waste collec- <br />tion and several permitting requirements that gives the Solid <br />Waste Disposal District, through approval by the District Board, <br />the authority and responsibility to implement the mandatory col- <br />lection and fund the operations as deemed appropriate and neces- <br />sary. The actual implementation of the mandatory waste collec- <br />tion and accompanying funding procedures will all be implemented <br />through resolution and contractual agreements, all of which are <br />subject to the approval and execution by the S.W.D.D. Board. <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.