My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/9/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
8/9/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 0 9 1990 BOOK f1�Ey <br />Director Keating stated that the only thing is that you will <br />have to have a Concurrency Certificate on application and there <br />is a fee for that. Also whether yob need an endangered species <br />study or something of that nature might enter in. <br />Commissioner Bird commented that he has heard some complaint <br />that the applicant and engineers are not allowed to speak at the <br />Technical Review Committee meetings, . <br />Director Keating explained that almost always a staff <br />Planner goes outside with the design specialist, if desired, and <br />gets any question cleared up right then and there. When you open <br />the meeting up is when you get into major policy discussions, and <br />that is what they want to avoid. <br />Commissioner Bird hoped there is some point in this whole <br />process where someone can come in and discuss a possible project <br />without having to pay any fee, and Director Keating noted you can <br />get a general opinion rom staff without a charge, but not in <br />writing. <br />Chairman Eggert brought up the question of having more than <br />one exit, especially in some of the larger subdivisions, and <br />Director Boling confir ed that something will be included about <br />the ability to require emergency access. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone had any comments. <br />Asst. County Attorney Collins pointed out that Page 63 of <br />the Subdivision Ordinance adds a new paragraph about the surety <br />that can be posted to secure subdivision improvements. He had no <br />problem with this addition, but just wanted the Board to be aware <br />of it. <br />Commissioner Birdlreferred to the requirements for Bikeways, <br />etc., and stated that a still has a problem with requiring these <br />little incremental sidewalks and bikeways which do not hook up to <br />anything. He did not think this is the right way to do this and <br />felt that instead we should escrow the money and then do the <br />whole length all at on time and maintain it. <br />20 <br />- M M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.