My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/9/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
8/9/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � r <br />Director Boling reviewed Chapter 954 - Off -Street Parking, <br />the highlights of which are as follows: <br />Chapter 954 <br />Off -Street Parking <br />More categories added (35 to 58) <br />3 uses increased, 5 decreased <br />Non -paving options expanded <br />Parking lot design flexibility increased <br />Circulation criteria added <br />Shared parking for mixed uses allowed <br />Director Boling advised that this is an ordinance we have <br />wanted to expand for sometime, and probably the most significant <br />change is to increase the number of categories. He noted that we <br />have copies of 45 parking ordinances from various states and <br />continued to go over the highlights. <br />Commissioner Bird commented that he gets the impression <br />staff is trying to be as reasonable as possible on these <br />requirements which use up green space and cost a lot of money. <br />He felt there is a whole list of reasons why an oversize parking <br />lot is bad in a lot.of ways. <br />Director Boling noted that we are heading in the direction <br />of allowing some grass parking areas for "peak" season. <br />Robert Gaskill of Vista Properties voiced his objection to <br />the requirement that all multifamily developments having 50 or <br />more dwelling units shall provide one screened space for the <br />storage of recreational vehicles for each 10 dwelling units. He <br />noted that there is a provision that this requirement can be <br />waived if the developer puts in the covenants a statement <br />restricting the storage of such vehicles to a certain time <br />period. Firstly, he did not think you can have covenants in <br />rental projects, and secondly, if you can, he felt it should be <br />optional to have a covenant that you won't allow such vehicles on <br />the property. <br />AUG 0 0 1990 25 NOK ���vE. ��„ f <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.