8/9/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AUG 0 9 1990 �ooK 6 89FJ enforced. He next wished to know if there is a legal reason for exempting counties, districts, etc., from their own ordinances. Attorney Collins di -d not see if the work is -being done in our own easements and R/W who we would..get a permit from, and noted that any time we do development, we have to meet the standards. Mr. Smith felt that technically according to this, the County doesn't have to, and while he doesn't think the County would sidestep their own rules, it just doesn't look good. Chairman Eggert asked that this be looked into. Mr. Smith next referred to Page 15, lines 16 through 27, which language he felt was completely contradictory to the requirements of the Type B stormwater permit, which flatly requires a Cut and Fill Balance for fill below that flood plain elevation. This appears to allow you to increase that flood up to a 1' distance. Mr. Cain advised Mr. Smith that in the next draft that language will be removed. Mr. Smith then referred to Page 29, about required informa- tion for permit application. He realized that this get into the question of what profession can practice what, but noted that they speak about drainage being permitted by a registered architect for one acre or less. He did not believe that St. John's, the DOT, or any Drainage District, will accept any drainage work from a registered architect, and he would suggest that the people with background in hydrology and geotechnology should be doing this work. Warren Dill noted that he is not an engineer, and his comments are just based upon the workshop they had on this section. He referred to Page 12, Line 8 which states that detention ponds with any area having more than 2" of water at design storm or permanent pool shall be fenced and noted they had a lot of discussion on this at the workshop because this would require you to fence water areas on golf courses, in public 36