8/9/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

conditions of the application have changed, then they have to apply for the Initial Certificate again. County Attorney Vitunac asked if any thought was given to calling the first certificate "Preliminary" instead of "Initial," and Mr. Rohani said it was not, but he did not have any problem with that. Mr. Rohani continued to review the steps in the concurrency determination, checking with all the evaluating agencies, etc., and noted that in general for each one of the items involved, we are looking at supply versus demand and looking at everything planned in the capital improvement program and the impact. Supply is everything we have existing and everything that is planned. For demand we are looking at existing demand and also "committed demand," - plans that are approved and could proceed to completion. It is very important that this chapter provide for vested right determination and appeal. Chairman Eggert noted that in the question of supply and demand, the applicants have to provide a lot of information, and she wished to know if we are going to have data bases coming out of the different departments that will help the applicants. She was very concerned about the impacts of the Growth Management Act and also very concerned that the applicants have the most cooperation and information available. Mr. Rohani confirmed that we do have a data base provided from the various departments and it has to be updated constantly. He did not think concurrencies could be done without a good computerized data base. He further noted that this may soon be a countywide ordinance. Indian River Shores and Vero Beach are participating with us, and he believed Sebastian is interested in - coming in. Concurrency all goes back to the L.O.S. issue and that actually is the same as quality of life. Commissioner Bird hoped that the application that will be used to start the process will be as specific and clear as �,- 1� o 5 AUG0 9 1990