My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/9/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
8/9/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Rohani then referred to Page 49, for the Conservation <br />District, the table with the size and dimension criteria, and <br />noted for maximum lot coverage we have 10% and minimum open space <br />800. This is good when you are dealing with a new lot which is 1 <br />unit for 40 acres, but it was brought to his attention that we <br />have some existing small lots where, if the 10% is applied, you <br />cannot build; so, we have to make sure this is taken into <br />consideration. <br />Attorney Collins inquired why Sec. 911.16 - Administrative <br />Procedure on Page 75 can't go into Chapter 902 - Administrative <br />Mechanisms. <br />Mr. Rohani had no problem with that if the Attorney felt it <br />is better. <br />Chairman Eggert asked why not have it in zoning, but <br />Attorney Collins thought that it is easier to have these <br />procedures all in one place. <br />Commissioner Bird suggested that we just reference in this <br />chapter that the administrative procedure is in the other <br />chapter. <br />Attorney Collins noted that the Planned Development District <br />starts on Page 65 and then on the following pages allows for <br />density bonuses for affordable housing and environmental <br />protection. He felt it would be a good idea to allow units to be <br />transferred in from other environmentally sensitive sites, and he <br />was not sure if this provides for that. <br />Planner Rohani agreed we could do that. <br />Attorney Collins was confused by the density bonus. He <br />noted that if you have 100 acres and half of it should be <br />protected, why not shift it all to the upland area, but why get a <br />bonus and increase the si•:ze of your project. <br />Director Keating explai'ned that in the transfer you don't <br />have the same densities and you would not be increasing the size <br />of the project.. <br />59 <br />moo 8 0 F- "1, 84 <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.