8/9/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AAJ G 0 9 1990 a a Attorney Collins then asked if you are allowed 20% bonus for affordable housing and 20% for environmental protection, are you are stacking these bonuses so you could end up with 40%. Director Keating agreed that is a•.good point, and that 200 should be a maximum. Chairman Eggert referred to the wording on the bottom of page 8. She felt the width after setback shouldn't be in there, and Mr. Rohani advised they took care of that language. Warren Dill brought up the fact that the Con -2 District on Page 47 includes everything on the east side of the Sebastian River between Roseland Road and the Sebastian River, plus it is on the west side of the river also. There is a relatively short distance on the east side - probably less than 1,0001, but by having 1 unit per 40 acres, every lot is now thrown into a non -conforming status. While he recognizes the need for the protected area, he believed what will happen is that some will annex into the City of Sebastian because they can't meet the setbacks and would have to go in for a variance. Director Keating noted that part of this land is being considered for CARL acquisition, and it is an overall environ- mentally sensitive area. Planner Rohan! felt you could take care of the setback problem by saying the setbacks do not apply to existing lots, and possibly have 2 tiered minimum setbacks, etc., for the existing ones. Mr. Dill emphasized that virtually all these properties are under 40 acres, and he felt something must be done about this so the owners don't have to pay a $500 application fee for a variance. Possibly this could be considered for RS -1. Director Keating felt that we can change the setback requirement; that won't be any problem, and we will probably put in that any non -conforming lots of record existing prior to February 13, 1990, can develop meeting the size and dimension criteria of the RS -1 District. 60