My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/9/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
8/9/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AAJ G 0 9 1990 <br />a a <br />Attorney Collins then asked if you are allowed 20% bonus for <br />affordable housing and 20% for environmental protection, are you <br />are stacking these bonuses so you could end up with 40%. <br />Director Keating agreed that is a•.good point, and that 200 <br />should be a maximum. <br />Chairman Eggert referred to the wording on the bottom of <br />page 8. She felt the width after setback shouldn't be in there, <br />and Mr. Rohani advised they took care of that language. <br />Warren Dill brought up the fact that the Con -2 District on <br />Page 47 includes everything on the east side of the Sebastian <br />River between Roseland Road and the Sebastian River, plus it is <br />on the west side of the river also. There is a relatively short <br />distance on the east side - probably less than 1,0001, but by <br />having 1 unit per 40 acres, every lot is now thrown into a <br />non -conforming status. While he recognizes the need for the <br />protected area, he believed what will happen is that some will <br />annex into the City of Sebastian because they can't meet the <br />setbacks and would have to go in for a variance. <br />Director Keating noted that part of this land is being <br />considered for CARL acquisition, and it is an overall environ- <br />mentally sensitive area. <br />Planner Rohan! felt you could take care of the setback <br />problem by saying the setbacks do not apply to existing lots, and <br />possibly have 2 tiered minimum setbacks, etc., for the existing <br />ones. <br />Mr. Dill emphasized that virtually all these properties are <br />under 40 acres, and he felt something must be done about this so <br />the owners don't have to pay a $500 application fee for a <br />variance. Possibly this could be considered for RS -1. <br />Director Keating felt that we can change the setback <br />requirement; that won't be any problem, and we will probably put <br />in that any non -conforming lots of record existing prior to <br />February 13, 1990, can develop meeting the size and dimension <br />criteria of the RS -1 District. <br />60 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.