Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Rohani stated that on Page 49 we would just have to add <br />that they would have to meet the requirements of RS -1, and <br />Chairman Eggert felt that would be good. <br />Monte Falls referred to Page 8, Item 4, regarding corner <br />lots providing a front yard on each street frontage, but the <br />buildable width not being reduced to less than 30 feet and <br />commented that he felt we probably should state "or the minimum <br />lot width minus two times the sideyard setbacks' so we don't have <br />something that conflicts. He then referred to Page 18, which he <br />believed has added improvements to RS -2 and RS -3 that they didn't <br />have before in regard to bikeways, sidewalks, etc. <br />Mr. Rohani explained that single family and multi family <br />subdivisions have all those requirements, but this is on the <br />frontage, not internal roads. <br />Mr. Falls stressed that he would like to see it clarified <br />that was not required for the interior streets in those <br />districts. He asked if we need to show mining as a special <br />permission use on Page 21, and Director Keating noted that is <br />included under the Mining Ordinance as an exemption. <br />Mr. Falls continued that Page 22 shows a setback in the RM -6 <br />District of 251, and if a single family use occurred in that <br />district, why wouldn't the Single Family setback of 20' apply. <br />Director Keating explained that we are not differentiating <br />regarding setbacks any more between single family and multi <br />family use within the multi family district. <br />Mr. Falls personally felt that would penalize someone <br />bringing in a development with less density. He then referred to <br />Page 28 Commercial Use areas and noted that he did not see <br />language stating no industrial or manufacturing uses shall be <br />allowed in a commercial district unless public sewer is <br />available. ` <br />Director Keating advised that will be in the new draft. <br />Mr. Falls next referred to Page 60 4a. and wished to have a <br />more <br />specific definition of what "properly <br />screened" <br />means. <br />AUG 0 9 <br />61 <br />1990 <br />