8/14/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M M generally what the Board will support. He did feel we need to keep higher densities in some areas, particularly in the south of the county where we have the wastewater system, but felt we can cut back the urban service area a little bit in some other areas and meet some of DCA's complaints. He believed that west of the marsh area we can have lower densities without much objection. Commissioner Scurlock felt staff can just -argue their points as close to our position as possible, but Commissioner Bird stressed that he would hate to cut a deal with the DCA without having another public hearing with the AG interests. Chairman Eggert asked if Attorney Collins has talked to the people involved about changing to 1 unit to 10 acres west of 1-95, and if so, what was their reaction. Attorney Collins advised that he hasn't talked to a large sample, but those he talked to.seemed to feel it is realistic. Chairman Eggert then asked about the nodes at the major 1-95 intersections, and Director Keating felt that we can sit down with the DCA and explain that is high and dry land with services available and explain our policies that restrict it. Commissioner Scurlock believed the only areas that may develop are by those nodes, and that the rest of it at, even at a density of 1/40, won't mean anything today. When that land is ready to develop, then we can go back in with a Comp Plan amendment and argue that out. Commissioner Bird continued to stress that the 1-95 corridor is what will develop in the future, and the Board agreed that the areas that will develop are at the 512, SR 60 and Oslo nodal areas. Attorney Collins asked for direction, and Commissioner Bird believed the Board has indicated that staff should negotiate along the lines we have discussed, make the best deal possible, and then bring it back to the Board for their decision. 86 13 da �� f AUG 141990