My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/11/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
9/11/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:43:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/11/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP 11 1990 <br />Chapter 914, Site Plan Review and Approval Procedures <br />* Major re -formatting <br />�J" FAvr �3, 6 .n <br />* Thresholds for major, minor, administrative approval <br />categories better specified I <br />* Significant redevelopment projects require major site plan <br />approval <br />2* Formal pre -app conference required for larger projects <br />* Completeness check required <br />* Submittal requirements updated <br />* Timeframes for review: similar to now, specified <br />* Applicant may request to go to P&Z Commission at any time <br />* More specified criteria for BCC review of site plan extensions <br />* Conceptual site plan submittal requirements specified <br />* Site must be maintained as shown on approved site plan <br />* Other chapter reqs. cited: site plan must comply <br />Director Boling informed the Board that staff would like to <br />propose adding at the top of Page 28 (e) a requirement that a <br />project show the phase lines on the site plan. He further noted <br />that on the bottom of Page 34 they would like to specify that for <br />minor site plans you don't have to meet the bikeway/sidewalk <br />requirements and the paved road requirements. They want to put <br />in a section up front that deals with that, and just below that a <br />section that deals with phasing. Director Boling stressed that <br />they want to make sure that when you phase a project, each phase <br />can stand alone. He also wished to emphasize that a formal <br />preapplication conference is proposed to be required for larger <br />projects. <br />No public comment. <br />Chapter 915, Planned Development (P.D.) <br />i <br />* Other land development reqs. referenced: PDs must comply <br />* PRD concept expanded: <br />Residential and agricultural, office, commercial•, <br />industrial covered. <br />Zoning overlay district process established <br />* Existing PRD ordinance retired: can convert to P.D. <br />* Density credit for environmental transfer, affordable housing <br />* Standards for industrial, commercial, residential, and <br />agricultural uses specified <br />* Compatibility measures specified <br />* Open space and recreation standards specified (as in PRD) <br />* Proper connections to public infrastructure required <br />* Submittal requirements up-to-date and specific for all <br />application types <br />* Modification procedure better specified <br />No public comment. <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.