My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
10/16/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:50:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/16/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 1990 BOOK <br />PETITION PAVING PROJECTS (PAY REQUEST #5/MARSHALL McCULLY & <br />ASSOC.) <br />The Board reviewed memo from the Engineering Department: <br />-------James Chandler <br />TO; ----------------------------- ------- :. <br />County Administrator ��g/ t, i ; l c•;" <br />THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director, <br />and % <br />Roger D. Cain, P.E. <br />County Engineer <br />FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, CET <br />Civil Engineer <br />SUBJECT: Pay Request #5 from Marshall, McCully & Associates <br />for Petition Paving Projects: 33rd Street, 1st Street <br />SW and 26th Street <br />DATE: September 24, 1990 <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />The Engineering Division has received Pay Request #5 from <br />Marshall, McCully & Associates for the above referenced projects. <br />The work is approximately 95% complete. The Engineer is waiting <br />for a response from the utility companies to show the new <br />location of the utility poles on the plans. <br />Marshall, McCully & Associates is requesting payment less 50 <br />retainage instead of the 10% which is stated in the Master <br />Agreement. The 5% retainage is adequate enough to cover the work <br />that remains to be done. <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING <br />It is recommended that motions be made to approve Pay Request #5 <br />leaving 5% retainage. <br />Funds will come out of Account #173-214-541-033.19. <br />Chairman Eggert was a bit concerned with the 10% retainage <br />being reduced to 50, and Public Works Director Davis advised that <br />in some cases when an engineer is substantially complete with 990 <br />of the work, and they are just waiting for a permit or some minor <br />item to come in that can hold them up for months, they may have a <br />cash flow problem. <br />Chairman Eggert hoped that if the project is essentially <br />complete, then nothing can happen that would require us to dig in <br />more than 5%. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that 10% really comes in more <br />when there are materials or something of that nature that haven't <br />54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.