Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
r <br />OCT 2 3 1990 <br />BOOK Si P,1,E _ �4 <br />do not stop very quickly. When you remove the right for the crew <br />to blow the horn, they must put the train in emergency stop also <br />risking derailment and injury to the railroad crews. <br />County Attorney Vitunac pointed out that our ordinance does <br />not prohibit a train from blowing the horn if there is a car in <br />the way or someone on the track, but Mr. Abood stated that <br />Florida Statute No. 351.03 requires all train horn bans to be <br />unconditional, and it does not leave any discretion with the <br />crew. <br />Chairman Eggert expressed her belief that if someone is going <br />to run past the gates, the whistle is not going to stop them. <br />Mr. Abood cited an experience where the engineer saw that <br />happening, blew the horn, and the accident was averted. He <br />stressed that when the horn is blown, at least people are alerted <br />that a train is in the area, and it is the railroad's position <br />that is a benefit from a safety standpoint. <br />Commissioner Scurlock expressed his feeling that if the <br />railroad spent less time working on this whistle ban and more <br />time cooperating with the communities, they would be spending <br />their time to a better purpose. <br />Commissioner Wheeler felt that if the flashing lights and <br />bells don't stop the people from crossing the tracks, the horn <br />won't either. <br />Commissioner Bowman had trouble with the accident figures <br />presented by the railroad because they do not indicate how much <br />their total nighttime traffic is compared to daytime traffic. <br />She believed they have much heavier train traffic during the <br />nights than in the daytime and believed that tilts the figures <br />considerably. <br />Attorney Vitunac wished to know if Mr. Abood knew that our <br />ordinance allows the engineer to blow the horn if a car is on the <br />track, and Mr. Abood stated that he has the ordinance but does <br />not see where it says that, and if it does, the ordinance is in <br />violation of Statute 351.03. <br />28 <br />_I <br />