My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
10/23/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:51:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/23/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />Robert M. Keating, AICP kwK <br />Community Development Director <br />October 17, 1990 <br />FEES FOR NEW LDR-ESTABLISHED <br />PERMITS <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular <br />meeting of October 23, 1990. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />With the adoption of the county's land development regulations on <br />September 11, 1990, several permits and review processes were <br />established. These include conceptual, initial, and final <br />concurrency determinations, de -minimus variance requests, dune <br />vegetation maintenance permits, wetland resource permits, and <br />agricultural (cluster) planned development applications. <br />Each of these permits/review processes will involve staff time in <br />review, analysis, and permit issuance. To recoup that cost and <br />ensure that the cost is paid by those receiving the benefit, it is <br />necessary to establish fees for those reviews. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: <br />To determine the appropriate fee amount for each permit/review <br />process, the staff estimated the amount of time by staff position <br />involved, in each review process. Based upon this staff time <br />estimate, a review fee was established for each process. Those <br />fees are shown in the revised planning division fee schedule <br />(attached). Only those fees with the amount underlined are being <br />changed; all others.will remain the same. <br />Several alternatives exist regarding these proposed fees. The <br />board could adopt the fees as proposed or reduce them. To adopt <br />these fees, the board of county commissioners must approve a <br />resolution amending the planning division fee schedule._ The <br />proposed fee schedule attached to this item reflects the: fees <br />referenced above; however, it retains all other fees at their <br />present levels. .- <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />The staff recommends that the board of county commissioners adopt <br />the attached resolution revising the planning division fee <br />schedule. <br />"990 57 BOOK 4A Fk9Ct <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.