My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
10/23/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:51:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/23/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i CT 2 31990 mu 81 P,auu 7 <br />Traffic Engineer Michael Dudeck advised that while we don't <br />have a design trigger per se, when we hit 70o capacity, that <br />triggers a traffic analysis. <br />Commissioner Scurlock still wished to know if anyone sees any <br />reason why we couldn't have a developer's agreement at a very <br />early stage when a developer is doing rezoning so that he will be <br />on the hook just as he is for utilities to provide the money to <br />build the capacity for his project. <br />Director Keating pointed out that is referenced in the <br />Concurrency Requirements Table under "Capacity Not Available." <br />Administrator Chandler believed the question is, when you <br />already have LOS problems, do you hit the person at that early <br />stage when he may not develop for years. He will be hit with <br />this under the initial concurrency review when he gets serious <br />about developing his site. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that staff then apparently is <br />comfortable with the way -this is set up at the second stage. He <br />asked what action is required today and was informed that none is <br />required; this is just review. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that staff all have done an <br />excellent job and did not think the general public realizes what <br />a great staff we have. <br />FEES FOR NEW LDR-ESTABLISHED PERMITS <br />The Board reviewed memo from the Community Development <br />Director: <br />56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.